SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 166

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ALOK ARADHE
Tiruchirappalli District Cricket Association – Appellant
Versus
Anna Nagar Cricket Club & Anr. Etc. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Ms. Shweta Singh Parihar, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mayank Mishra, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, AOR Mr. Kunwar Surya Pratap, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Akshaj Chaturvedi, Adv.

Judgement Key Points
**आदेश:**

[26] चूंकि अपीलकर्ता संघ की सदस्यता एवं संरचना संबंधी विवाद उच्च न्यायालय एवं वैधानिक प्राधिकारी के समक्ष लंबित हैं, अतः हमारा मत है कि उक्त प्रश्नों का शीघ्रातिशीघ्र निपटारा किया जाए। इस दृष्टि से, हम अपील को आंशिक रूप से स्वीकार करते हैं, उच्च न्यायालय के निर्णय एवं आदेश को पूर्व निर्देशित सीमा तक रद्द करते हैं, तथा यह निर्देश देते हैं कि उच्च न्यायालय रिट अपीलों का शीघ्रातिशीघ्र निपटारा करे ताकि वैधानिक प्राधिकारियां आवश्यकतानुसार जांच पूर्ण कर सकें एवं तार्किक निष्कर्ष पर पहुंच सकें, जिससे अपीलकर्ता का चुनाव शीघ्र संपन्न हो सके। उच्च न्यायालय तथा प्राधिकारियां हमारे आदेश की भावना का ध्यान रखेंगी।

[27] अपील(ें) इस प्रकार निस्तारित की जाती हैं। लंबित आवेदन, यदि कोई हों, भी निस्तारित हो जाते हैं।

JUDGMENT :

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal(s) are preferred by the appellant Cricket Association against the final judgment and order of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 12.06.2024 disposing of a clutch of Writ Appeals, namely Writ Appeal (MD) No. 896 of 2024 and Writ Appeal (MD) No. 915 of 2024.

3. The appellant is a district cricket association formed in 1958, registered as a society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, and governed by its rules and bye-laws and is affiliated with the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (‘TNCA’), the State association. The facts in both the appeals before the High Court were distinct in content but analogous in form in the manner in which they sought to impugn the alleged lapses in the workings of the appellant, and are canvassed below in brief.

4. Facts in Writ Appeal (MD) No. 896 of 2024: The facts in this appeal are that the respondent no. 1 cricket club preferred a writ petition seeking direction against the appellant to grant the respondent no. 1 membership of the appellant association alongside voting rights and also allow respondent no. 1 to participate in the knockout tournament for the year 2021-2022. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
Unlock Premium Legal Research supremetoday.ai ×
Join SupremeToday AI to access advanced analysis, AI highlights and smart tools.
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top