AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
DKG Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, S. E. B. I. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common procedural ruling on appeals. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background on the corporations and share manipulation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. sebi's investigative findings and subsequent penalties. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. details regarding the procedural issues faced by appellants. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 13 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's analysis of violations and rationale for penalties. (Para 21 , 22 , 26 , 29 , 33) |
| 6. application of penalties in light of established facts. (Para 37 , 39 , 40 , 44) |
| 7. final judgment confirms prior orders and penalties. (Para 46) |
JUDGMENT :
1. These Civil Appeals arise out of common impugned Order dated 07.01.2009 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (for short “SAT”).
3. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 1742 of 2009 is a Private Limited Company which was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 on 15.04.1997. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 5833 of 2009 was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 on 02.06.1997.
5. Investigations further revealed that the appellants had transferred the shares of STIL to a Company under the name and style of Sai Mangal Investrade Pvt. Ltd. (for short ‘SMIPL’). Similarly, entities like Classic Credit Limited, Gol
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.