Back
M. R. SHAH, A. S. BOPANNA
Y. Sai Satya Prasad – Appellant
Versus
D. Prabhakara Rao – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
1.0. Present contempt petition has been preferred by the 84 petitioners – erstwhile employees of the Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities alleging deliberate and willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed by this Court dated 7.12.2020 in MA No.1270 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No.11435 of 2018 and other allied Miscellaneous Applications in the case of Telangana Power Generation Corporation Limited vs. Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited reported in 2020 SCC Online SC 995 noncompliance alleged against the Telangana Power Utilities (hereinafter referred to as the “TS Power Utilities”).
2.0. Shri Huzefa Aziz Ahmadi learned Senior Advocate has appeared on behalf of the applicants, Shri Ranjit Kumar and Shri V Giri, learned Senior Advocates have appeared on behalf of alleged contemnors – Telangana Power Utilities and Shri Niraj Kishan Kaul, learned Senior Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities.
3.0. Shri Ahmadi, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants has vehemently submitted that by detailed judgment and orders dated 20.06.2020 and 7.12.2020 this Hon’ble Court accepted the report submit
Contempt of Court – To raise same objections/issues again and again would tantamount to contempt of Court – There must be an end to a litigation.
The court upheld the validity of the final seniority list, affirming compliance with the A.P. Reorganization Act and the One Man Committee's directives, while emphasizing the need for adherence to pr....
The Union of India's order under Section 92 of the 2014 Act, directing payment without a hearing, violated the principles of natural justice and is legally flawed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Respondent was entitled to be allocated to the State of Telangana even on spouse ground and the Union of India erred in rejecting the requ....
The court established that Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act governs the allocation of employees in public sector undertakings, overriding the applicability of Section 77.
The court established that the elimination of waiting lists does not prevent the consideration of the next qualified candidate when the selected candidate does not join.
Allocation of state cadre employees must consider spouse factors and local status as per guidelines under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
