S. KALEESWARAN vs STATE - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1112

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1112

UDAY UMESH LALIT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
S. KALEESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mrs. N.S. Nappinai, Adv. Mr. Asaithambi MSM, Adv. Mr. V. Balaji, Adv. Mr. Atul Sharma, Adv. Mr. C. Kannan, Adv. Mr. Nizamuddin, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. C.B. Gururaj, Adv. Mr. Animesh Dubey, Adv. Mr. Saleem Gul, Adv. Dr. Nanda Kishore, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Mahara, Adv. Ms. Vaidehi Rastogi, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.

1. Both the Criminal Appeal Nos. 160 of 2017 and 410 of 2017 are arising out of the common judgment and order dated. 22nd July 2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal Nos. 436/2014, 482/2014, 490/2014, 175/2015 and 176/2015, whereby the High Court while dismissing the said appeals has confirmed the judgment and order dated 22nd July, 2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Coimbatore (hereinafter referred to as the “Trial Court”) in Sessions Case No. 187/2008. The Trial Court had convicted the present appellants i.e., S. Kaleeswaran (Original Accused No. 5), John Anthonisamy @ John (Original Accused No.1) along with the other three Accused i.e., Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh (Original Accused No. 4), R. Ganeshkumar @ Ganesh (Original Accused No.3) and Muthumanickam @ Muthu (Original Accused No. 2) for the offence under Section 120(B), 147, 364 and 302 read with 120(B)/149, 201 and 396 I.P.C., and sentenced them as detailed below:

S. No.	Accused	Section of Law	Sentence
1.	A.1 to A.5	120(B) I.P.C.	Rigorous im

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 1112

UDAY UMESH LALIT, BELA M. TRIVEDIS. KALEESWARAN – AppellantVersusSTATE – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

UDAY UMESH LALIT, BELA M. TRIVEDI
S. KALEESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent