KRISHNA MURARI, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Harpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
1. Leave granted. With consent of counsel for the parties, the appeal was heard finally.
2. The appellants are aggrieved by the final judgment,1[Final judgment dated 18.03.2019 in FAO No. 2228/2007 (O&M) passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.] of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh, which partly allowed their first appeal, enhancing the compensation awarded to the petitioners from Rs.6,60,000 (with 6% interest) to Rs.17,66,000 (with 7.5% interest). The appellants’ grievance is that the High Court erred in computation of compensation for loss of income, and failed to award any amount under the head of “loss of love and affection”, while computing the final compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereafter, “MV Act”).
Facts
3. On 29.09.2004, the deceased, late Jagjit Singh was returning from Chandigarh in a car with two other passengers, when a negligently driven truck collided with their car. Grievously injured, he was transferred to the hospital for medical attention, but succumbed to his injuries. The claimant-petitioners instit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.