Back
M. R. SHAH, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Miss Hage Mamung – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. Shah, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 10.02.2022 passed by the Gauhati High Court (Itanagar Bench) in Writ Appeal No.12/2019, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by respondent No.1 herein and has directed the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the ’Public Service Commission’) for re-evaluation of the papers of respondent No.1 and respondent No.4 herein by quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 05.10.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 62/2018, the Public Service Commission has preferred the present appeal.
2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:
That the Public Service Commission issued an advertisement on 21.09.2016 for filling up of 22 posts of Agriculture Development Officer. Respondent Nos.1, 4 and 5 herein applied for the said posts. They successfully cleared the written examination and were called for viva-voce test. However thereafter when the Public Service Commission published the result by shortlisting 22 candidates, the name of the original writ petitio
Appointment – Re-evaluation of answer-sheets of written examination cannot be ordered without any concrete reason.
Constitutional Court cannot by itself re-evaluate the answer scripts.
Point of Law : Practice of calling for answer scripts/answer sheets and thereafter to order re-evaluation and that too in absence of any specific provision in relevant rules for re-evaluation and tha....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
