JUDGMENT :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

Since common questions of law and facts arise for consideration in both these petitions, they are taken up together for consideration and are now being disposed of vide common judgment.

2. The respondents vide advertisement dated 19.12.2018, invited applications from the eligible candidates for filling up the post of TGT (Non-Medical). The petitioners being fully eligible applied for the same and appeared in the written test held for the said purpose. According to the petitioners, the respondents released the provisional answer key of all the series of question paper and invited objections. Since the petitioners found some of key answers to be incorrect, they too raised objections. Later, the respondents on 28.6.2019 declared the result, wherein the petitioners were declared as successful and were called for written objective test. However, when the final result for the post was declared on 5.8.2019, the petitioners were stunned and surprised to see that their names do not find mention in the final select list only because the respondents have not considered the objections raised by the petitioners regarding the correctness of question Nos. 25 and 5