SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1281

A. S. BOPANNA, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Vigyashree Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The Appellant is before this Court assailing the Order dated 22.10.2018, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur. By the said Order, the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh has set aside the Order dated 18.1.2018, passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (in short ‘the Tribunal’, Bhopal in R.P. No. 106/2015, allowing the application filed by the appellant under Order 6 rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’), seeking to amend the claim petition and include the additional amount of Rs. 1,67,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand Only), which was deposited as an FDR and has been invoked by the respondents herein, which with interest and the other amount demanded through letter dated 1.1.2016 would be payable by the respondent.

3. The Tribunal, having taken note that the claim made by the appellant had arisen subsequent to the dispute being referred to arbitration, has allowed the application.

4. The High Court, while reversing the Order has essentially gone into the aspect of the power of the Tribunal to allow such application, keeping in view the inherent power, that is contemplated under the Code of Civil Procedure, vis-a-v


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top