SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 205

SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Basantibai – Appellant
Versus
Chamanlal Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Rohit Kumar Mangal for petitioner; Paresh Joshi for respondent.

ORDER

1. Heard finally, with the consent of the parties.

2. This miscellaneous petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners/defendants against the order dated 24.2.2024 (Annnexure P/1), passed by the Second Civil Judge, Junior Division Depalpur District Indore in RCSA5A/2018 (Civil Suit No.37-A/2015); whereby, an application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order 6 rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘CPC”) for amendment in the plaint, has been allowed.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are that initially on 25.8.2015, the respondent filed a civil Suit RCS No.37-A/2015 against the petitioner no.1 before the Second Civil Judge, Class II, Depalpur seeking relief for deletion of the name of petitioner No.1 with regard to House No.187, Tilak Marg, Street No.1 Depalpur. In the aforesaid suit, the petitioner No.1 also submitted his written statement along with counter claim and an application under Order 7 rule 11 of the CPC was also filed for rejection of the suit which was decided on 8.9.2016, and the suit was rejected. Thereafter the aforesaid suit continued with respect to the counter claim file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top