SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, B. V. NAGARATHNA
RAVI DHINGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAGARATHNA, J.
Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5296 of 2012. In all other cases, leave has already been granted.
2. The present appeals have been filed by five accused whose convictions were confirmed by the impugned judgement of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 13.02.2008, under Sections 148, 149 and 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’, for short). The details of the cases are as under:
| Criminal Appeals/SLP No. | Name of the accused persons | Period of custody undergone with remission |
| Criminal Appeal No. 987 of 2009 | Raman Goswami (Deceased, Accused No.3) | 6 years, 8 months & 10 days as per jail custody certificate dated 31.01.2023 (Since deceased) appeal abates. |
| Criminal Appeal No. 987 of 2009 | Ravi Dhingra (Accused No.4) | 7 years, 10 months & 13 days (on bail since 13.05.2009 as per jail custody certificate dated 31.01.2023) |
| Criminal Appeal Nos. 986 of 2009 and 988 of 2009 | Laxmi Narain (Accused No.5) | Custody certificate not produced |
| Cr | ||
Sk. Ahmed vs. State of Telangana
Lohit Kaushal vs. State of Haryana
Anil vs. Administration of Daman & Diu
Vishwanath Gupta vs. State of Uttaranchal (2007) 11 SCC 633 – Relied [Para 13]
Vikram Singh vs. Union of India
Malleshi vs. State of Karnataka
Jasvinder Saini vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (2013) 7 SCC 256
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. Karimullah Osan Khan (2014) 11 SCC 538 [Para 18]
Dr. Nallapareddy Sridhar Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2020) 12 SCC 467
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.