Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Santosh Paswan son of Ramdin Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common judgment for multiple appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments made by counsel regarding evidential gaps and flaws. (Para 10) |
| 3. arguments on the involvement of appellants (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. examination of witness testimonies (Para 18 , 19 , 88 , 140) |
| 5. court's rationale on establishing threats and kidnapping under ipc. (Para 141 , 220 , 226) |
| 6. application of section 364a ipc on kidnapping (Para 142 , 157 , 161) |
| 7. elements defining kidnapping under ipc (Para 145 , 146 , 147) |
| 8. final judgment and orders (Para 265 , 266 , 267) |
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
1. Since all the appeals arise out of the common judgment of conviction and order of sentence, as such they are taken up together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. These appeals have been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction dated 24.06.2016 and order of sentence dated 27.06.2016, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bokaro in Sessions Trial No. 393 of 2010, by which the appellants were found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 364A read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and were convicted
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
