SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1545

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
Usha Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors. Etc. – Respondent
SLP (C) Nos. 10563-10565 of 2022 with SLP(C) No. 10862-10864 of 2022
Decided On : 13-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Ld. ASG, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, For Petitioner(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Ld. ASG, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate, For Petitioner(s)/ Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate, Respondent(s) Mr. Rajat Khatry, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocate, Ms. Neetu Jain, Advocate, Mr. Shagun R., Advocate, Mr. Vishal Nautiyal, Advocate, For Respondent(s) Mr. Shivam Singh, Advocate, Mr. Harpreet Singh Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Kailas Bajirao Autade, Advocate, councel for the Appearing Parties.

The court has the discretion to grant exemptions, issue notice, and set timelines for filing pleadings in the interest of justice.

Headnote:

Exemption - Filing of Documents - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The court allowed applications for exemption from filing O.T., exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment, and permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures.

Finding of the Court:

The court issued notice and stayed the operation of the impugned judgment, allowing the elected persons to continue participating as members of the Panchayat. The parties were directed to file counter affidavit and rejoinder within specified timelines.

Issues: Exemption from filing documents, notice issuance, stay of judgment operation, and timelines for filing pleadings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised discretion in allowing exemptions and issuing notice, while also staying the operation of the impugned judgment and setting timelines for filing pleadings.

Final Decision: The court granted exemptions, issued notice, stayed the operation of the judgment, and set timelines for filing pleadings.

ORDER

1. Applications for exemption from filing O.T., exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures are allowed.

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No. 5 (Usha Kaushik) and Mr. Kailas Bajirao Autade, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 in SLP(Civil) Nos. 10862-10864/2022 and respondent No. 5 in SLP(Civil) Nos. 10563-10565/2022 (Saryug Mochi, Punam Devi and Vijay Paswan).

4. Dasti in addition through standing counsel for the State.

5. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks.

6. Rejoinder be filed within two weeks thereafter.

7. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned judgment is stayed but the elected persons will continue to participate as members of the Panchayat.

8. List for directions on 01.09.2022 to ensure pleadings are complete and thereafter the matter can be set down for hearing.

9. The parties to also file short synopsis running into not more than 3 pages each.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top