SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1588

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ.
Teesta Atul Setalvad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Gujarat – Respondent
SLP (Crl.) No(s).7413-7414 of 2022
Decided On : 22-08-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Mihir Desai, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate, Ms. Karishma Maria, Advocate, Mr. Nizam Pasha, Advocate, Mr. Adit Subramaniam Pujari, Advocate, Ms. Aparajita Jamwal, Advocate, Ms. Madhulika Mohta, Advocate, For the Appellant.

The court considered the contents of the FIR and the petitioner's custody, and issued notice returnable on a specific date.

Headnote:

FIR - Allegations in FIR Recitation of Court Proceedings - The court considered the contents of the FIR and the petitioner's custody, and issued notice returnable on a specific date.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner has no objection to the Bench hearing the petitions. The petitioner was taken into custody on 25.06.2022 and has been in custody since then.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the contents of the FIR and the petitioner's custody, and issued notice returnable on 25.08.2022. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the learned standing counsel for the State.

Issues: Allegations in the FIR and the petitioner's custody.

Ratio Decidendi: Considering the facts and circumstances of the case on record, the court issued notice returnable on 25.08.2022.

Final Decision: Notice issued, returnable on 25.08.2022. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the learned standing counsel for the State.

ORDER

1. Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that his client has no objection to this Bench hearing the instant petitions.

2. We have heard Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Aparna Bhat, learned advocate for the petitioner.

3. Mr. Sibal has invited our attention to the contents of F.I.R. No. 11191011220087 dated 25.06.2022 registered with DCB Police Station Ahmedabad.

4. It is submitted that the allegations in the F.I.R. are nothing but recitation of the proceedings which had culminated in the judgment of this Court and beyond such recitation nothing specific has been alleged against the petitioner.

5. It is further submitted that the petitioner was taken in custody on 25.06.2022 and since then has been in custody.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case on record, issue notice, returnable on 25.08.2022.

7. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

8. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve the learned standing counsel for the State.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top