SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1936

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, ABHAY S. OKA, JJ.
Nitish Adhikary @ Bapan - Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s). 5769 of 2022
Decided On : 01-08-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Piyush Sharma, Mr. Arvind Gupta, Mr. Shailesh Kumar Prasad, Mr. Pravesh Nirwal, Ms. Lata R. Agarwal, Mr. Avijit Mishra

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21(c) and 37 - Bail application - The petitioner seeks enlargement on bail in connection with FIR under NDPS Act, having undergone custody for over one year with a trial in preliminary stages and without any criminal antecedents - No appearance by the State. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Bail - Criteria for grant - Consideration of time spent in custody and the nature of the case - Court grants bail based on the length of custody without expressing views on merits. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner has been in custody for 1 year and 7 months in a case under the NDPS Act, with only one witness examined so far.

Findings of Court:
Bail granted, subject to furnishing bonds as required by the Trial Court.

Issues: The main issue addressed was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the duration of custody and the preliminary stage of the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: Considering the significant time spent in custody without any criminal antecedents and the fact that the trial is only at the preliminary stage, bail is granted without delving into the case's merits.

Result: Bail granted.

Table of Content
1. details of the petitioner and case background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's reasoning for granting bail. (Para 4)
3. conclusion and terms of bail granted. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER :

1. As per the office report dated 29.07.2022, copy of the show cause notice along with Special Leave Petition was supplied to the Standing Counsel for the State of West Bengal and separate notice has been served on the State also. However, no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

2. The petitioner seeks enlargement on bail in F.I.R. No. 612 of 2020 dated 17.10.2020 filed under Section 21(c) and 37 of the NDPS Act, registered at Police Station Bongaon, West Bengal.

3. During the course of the hearing, we are informed that the petitioner has undergone custody for a period of 01 year and 07 months as on 09.06.2022. The trial is at a preliminary stage, as only one witness has been examined. The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.

4. Taking into consideration the period of sentence undergone by the petitioner and all the attending circumstances but without expressing any views in the merits of the case, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. The petitioner is accordingly, directed to be released on bail subject to him furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

6. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of on the afore stated terms.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top