Neelam Parashar vs Shashank Sharma - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1628

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1628

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Neelam Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Shashank Sharma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Shashi Kiran, Advocate, Dr. Satish Chandra,Advocate, Mr. Arjun Sain, Advocate, Ms. Sangeeta Bhalla, Advocate, Ms. Surabhi Lata, Advocate, Mr. Sukesh Gosh, Advocate, Mr. Sarthak Chaturvedi, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Vaibhav Maheshwari, Advocate, Mr. Varad Dwivedi, Advocate, Ms. Munisha Anand, Advocate, Mr. Taqdees Sajad, Advocate, Mr. Rohit Gautam, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Abhay Kumar Tayal, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of matrimonial case filed by the respondent-husband in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Courts, Karkardooma East District, Delhi

2. On 12.01.2022, notice was issued by this Court and an interim order was passed staying further proceedings pending before the Family Court at Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.

3. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances on the record, in our view, no case for transfer of the proceedings is made out.

5. The transfer petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2022 Supreme(SC) 1628

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHATNeelam Parashar – AppellantVersusShashank Sharma – Respondent

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Neelam Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Shashank Sharma – Respondent