AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Tulsi Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER
1. The present petition came to be filed assailing the order dated 03.03.2022 where the High Court while dealing with an application seeking anticipatory bail dismissed the interim relief prayed for by the petitioner and while admitting the bail petition posted the matter for final hearing in due course. The order dated 03.03.2022 is extracted hereunder:
'Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant ad-interim bail to the applicant.
Accordingly, I.A. No. 01/2022 is dismissed.
Heard.
Admit.
Call for the records.
State counsel is directed to obtain criminal antecedent of the applicant.
Post the matter for final hearing in due course.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge'
2. Ordinarily, this Court where there is refusal to grant interim relief is not inclined to interfere but this is somewhat peculiar facts brought to the notice of this Court where the applicant who approached for seeking anticipatory bail the learned Judge of the High Court while admitting the bail petition dismissed the interim relief and posted the matter for hearing in due course.
3. This is an unusual practice and which this Court has never come across. Earlier also, this practice being
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.