SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1695

B. R. GAVAI, SANDEEP MEHTA
Ashok Balwant Patil – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Madhukar Patil – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. Mr. Risvi Muhammed, Adv. Mr. Durgesh Gupta, Adv.

Table of Content
1. permission granted; delay condoned; case closed (Para 1 , 2 , 7 , 8)
2. court emphasizes need for timely bail hearings (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

ORDER

2. Delay condoned.

4. We are amazed with the speed in which the application for anticipatory bail is considered by the High Court of Bombay.

6. No doubt, that the liberty of a citizen is a most important factor. However, at the same time, the consideration of an application for permanent bail on merits is also necessary. We, therefore, request the High Court to take up the matter expeditiously and decide the same finally within a period of one month from today.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top