Deepak Aggarwal vs Balwan Singh - 2024 Supreme(SC) 1366

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 1366

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Deepak Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Balwan Singh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. Mr. Naveen Pahwa, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Parminder Singh, Adv. Mr. Aroon Menon, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Manavi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Nilay Gupta, Adv. Mr. Varun Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Toshiv Goyal, Adv. Mr. Ritwik Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. Sham Diwan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Airi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Tanvi Dubey, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, AOR Mr. Yash Dubey, Adv. Mr. Mekala Ganesh Kumar Reddy, Adv. Mr. Aditya Nema, Adv. Mr. Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saifuddin Shams, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, AOR Mr. Anmol Kheta, Adv. Ms. Shabnam Shams, Adv. Mr. Anup Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, AOR Mr. Aakash Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Aditya Dahiya, Adv. Mr. Rn Mahalawat, Adv. Mr. Atmaram N S Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sandeep Choudhary, AOR Ms. S.s. Rebello, Adv. Ms. Deepti Arya, Adv. Ms. Arzu Paul, Adv. Ms. Manisha Gupta, Adv. Ms. Himanshi Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Rishikesh Haridas, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dahiya, Adv. Mrs. Manita Mahlawat, Adv. Mr. Vishal Mahajan, A.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Fateh Singh, Adv. Dr. Sukhdev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Venkatesh Rajput, Adv.

Table of Content
1. common issues related to multiple petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. challenge against high court's anticipatory bail order. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
3. the court discusses the nature and implications of the high court's ad-interim relief. (Para 7 , 11)
4. court's disapproval of ad-interim relief types. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. clarification on law regarding anticipatory bail. (Para 16)
6. directions for future hearing of bail applications. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

ORDER :

1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned petitions are same and they all arise from a self same First Information Report those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.17504 of 2024 is treated as the lead matter. The order passed in this matter shall govern the disposal of the other connected petitions.

3. Leave granted.

4. This appeal arises from the order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Hayana at Chandigarh dated 08.11.2024 in CRM-M No. 52981/2024 by which the High Court in an application seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 239 dated 11.07.2024 registered with police station So