Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, JJ.
L. Narasimhaiah – Appellant
Versus
The Divisional Controller, Mysore Urban Division – Respondent
Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2022 (Arising out of Diary No. 10074 of 2022) in SLP (Civil) No. 27074 of 2016
Decided On : 01-11-2022
Review Petition - Dismissal - The court dismissed the Review Petition after finding that the grounds raised did not establish any error apparent on record to justify interference.
Fact of the Case:
The court considered the delay in filing the Review Petition, rejected the application for listing the Review Petition in open Court, and ultimately dismissed the Review Petition after considering rival submissions and facts on record.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the grounds raised in the Review Petition did not establish any error apparent on record to justify interference.
Issues: Delay in filing Review Petition, rejection of application for listing of Review Petition in open Court, grounds raised in the Review Petition
Ratio Decidendi: The grounds raised in the Review Petition did not make out any error apparent on record to justify interference.
Final Decision: The Review Petition was dismissed.
ORDER
1. Delay in filing Review Petition is condoned.
2. Application for listing of Review Petition in open Court is rejected.
3. The Special Leave Petition was disposed of after considering rival submissions and facts on record. The grounds raised in the Review Petition do not make out any error apparent on record to justify interference.
4. This Review Petition is, therefore dismissed.
The court dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
The court may condone delay in preferring a review petition if the grounds taken do not justify interference.
The court considered the delay in preferring the review petition, the substantial questions of law, and the grounds for the Review Petition in reaching its decision.
The court's decision to reject the Review Petition was based on the lack of justification for interference.
The court has the discretion to condone a delay in preferring a Review Petition, but the grounds taken must make out an error apparent on record to justify interference.
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it only addresses apparent errors, without reevaluating case merits.
The dismissal of the Review Petition due to the absence of a substantial question of law and the failure to establish any error apparent on record.
Dismissal of review petition due to delay in preferring special leave petitions without satisfactory explanation.
The court found that the review petition did not establish any error apparent on record, leading to its dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
