Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Uday Umesh Lalit, CJI., M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.
D. Krishna Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Hon’ble Secretary, Hon’ble Supreme Court Legal Service Committee & Ors. – Respondents
Review Petition (Civil) No. 237 of 2022 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 297 of 2019
Decided On : 01-11-2022
Review Petition - Application for listing Review Petition - The court rejected the application for listing the Review Petition in open Court and dismissed the Review Petition after finding no reason to justify interference.
Fact of the Case:
The court rejected the application for listing Review Petition in open Court and dismissed the Review Petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found no reason to justify interference and therefore dismissed the Review Petition.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The Review Petition is dismissed.
ORDER
1. Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected.
2. Since the said application is rejected, no permission to appear and argue in-person is granted.
3. We have gone through the grounds raised in the Review Petition and do not find any reason to justify interference.
4. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.
The court's decision to reject the Review Petition was based on the lack of justification for interference.
The court dismissed the review petition after finding no error apparent on record.
Review jurisdiction is not an appeal; it only addresses apparent errors, without reevaluating case merits.
The court found that the review petition did not establish any error apparent on record, leading to its dismissal.
The court upheld the compensation awarded by the Reference Court as the correct measure and found no error apparent on record to justify interference in Review Jurisdiction.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the Review Petition.
The court found no error apparent on record to justify interference in the previous judgment and dismissed the Review Petition.
The court's decision was based on the satisfaction that the facts and circumstances on record did not call for any interference and that the Review Petition did not make out any case for the exercise....
The court upheld the validity of the qualification certificate issued by Sister Nivedita College before the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 came into effect, in line with previous de....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
