K. M. JOSEPH, HRISHIKESH ROY
New Delhi Municipal Council – Appellant
Versus
Minosha India Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J. - Leave granted.
2. The foremost question which falls for determination by this Court is the impact of Section 60(6) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IBC' for brevity) and whether the aforesaid provision gives rise to a new lease of life to a proceeding at the instance of the corporate debtor on the basis of a moratorium which is put in place by virtue of the order passed under section 14 of the IBC and whether corporate debtor can take advantage of the same to bring the application in this case filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1996 Act').
3. Pursuant to an agreement dated 20.02.2015, the appellant placed a purchase order of Rs. 16,20,00,000/- with the respondent.
The appellant, however, issued a termination notice to the respondent on account of its alleged inaction and conduct which is described as non-responsive. This led to the respondent approaching the High Court of Delhi which finally culminated in a direction by the High Court to afford an opportunity of hearing to the respondent and to consider its representation. The appellant, however, rejected t
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. (2019) 5 SCC 755
Harbhajan Singh v. Press Council of India and others
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia and another
Noharlal Verma v. District Cooperative Central Bank Limited
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. IISCC (India) Limited AIR 2020 SC 59
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.