Sunil Lora vs State of Rajasthan - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1441

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1441

AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Sunil Lora – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Mrinmay Bhattmewara, Advocate, Ms. Samprati Bhattmewara, Advocate, Mr. Ankit Verma, Advocate, Mr. Vivek Gupta, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. H. D. Thanvi, Advocate, Mr. U. N. Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Achal Singh Bule, Advocate, Mr. Rishi Matoliya, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and find no reason to interfere in the order impugned at this stage.

2. However, after the charges are framed, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his application for bail before the trial Court.

3. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty.

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2022 Supreme(SC) 1441

AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNASunil Lora – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Sunil Lora – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent