K. Phanindra Reddy, I. A. S. vs G. Subramanian

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 341

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
K. Phanindra Reddy, I. A. S. – Appellant
Versus
G. Subramanian – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv., A.A.G. Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Ms. Vaidehi Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Richa Vishwakarma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Guru Krishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Adv. Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, AOR Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv. Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Chandrakant Reddy, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Rabu Manohar, Adv. Ms. Mugdha Pande, Adv. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Pratap, Adv. Mr. Lavkesh Bhambhani, Adv. Mr. Parameshwar, Adv. Ms. Kanika Singhal, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Adv. Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Rabu Manohar, Adv. Mr. Mugdha Pande, Adv. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Pratap, Adv. Mr. Lavkesh Bhambani, Adv. Mr. Mukta Helbe, Adv. Mr. Tathagat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, AOR

JUDGMENT

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. Delay condoned in Special leave Petition (Civil) @ D.No.10656 of 2023.

2. While the first special leave petition arises out of an order passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in an intra-court appeal challenging an order passed by the learned Judge in a contempt petition, the other special leave petitions arise out of the order passed substantially in a writ petition and in a review petition.

3. We have heard Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in all the special leave petitions and Shri Mahesh Jethmalani, Shri Guru Krishna Kumar, Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. The brief facts sufficient for the disposal of all these special leave petitions are as follows:-

(i) A batch of 49 writ petitions were filed by the office bearers of the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS), on the file of the High Court of Judicature at Madras seeking a direction to the State, the Director General of Police, the Superintendents of Police of various districts and the Inspectors of Police of certain police stations to permit the members of the Organisation to conduct a procession (Ro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 341

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHALK. Phanindra Reddy, I. A. S. – AppellantVersusG. Subramanian – Respondent

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
K. Phanindra Reddy, I. A. S. – Appellant
Versus
G. Subramanian – Respondent