SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 350

AJAY RASTOGI, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Government of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Makkal Nala Paniyalargal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant(s) Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. V. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mr. Shaikh F. Kalia, Adv. Ms. Divya Singh, Adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Sureshan P., AOR Mr. Deepak Joshi, Adv. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Adv. Mr. Joseph Sebastian, Adv. Mr. P Wilson, Sr. Adv. Mr. R. Nedumaran, AOR Mr. Apoorv Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Sapna Pillai, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Mishra, Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, AOR Mr. P. C. Chandrashekhar, Adv. Ms. Pinky Pawar, Adv. Mr. Aakas Pathak, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR Mr. S. Nandakumar, Adv. Ms. Deepika Nandakumar, Adv. Mr. Anand Murthi Rao, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Adv. Mohd. Nizamuddin Pasha, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Pandey, Adv. Mr. Lzafeer Ahmad, Adv. Mr. A. Raja Rajan, Adv. Mr. Subham Kothari, Adv. Mr. Prashant Padmanabhan, AOR Mr. Padam Priya, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Ms. Kajal Kumari, Adv. Mr. Raja Sanoor P., Adv. Mr. K. S. Selvan, Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Ms. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Adv. Mr. Raghunatha Sethupathy B, Adv. Ms. Priya R, Adv. Ms. Ishita Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Pariksha, Adv. Mr. S. Sabari Bala Pandian, Adv. Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Ajay Rastogi, J.

1. The instant appeals have been preferred at the instance of State of Tamil Nadu assailing the impugned judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court dated 19th August, 2014 affirming order of the learned Single Judge dated 23rd January, 2012 in its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the State Government to create the posts under the designation “Village Level Workers” which is called as “Makkal Nala Paniyalargal” (hereinafter being referred to as “MNP”) or by any other name but shall accommodate the persons who were on the rolls of MNP on the date of issuance of G.O.M No. 86 dated 8th November, 2011 against any vacant post in the State Government schools, village Panchayats, town Panchayats, Municipalities, Corporations, Collector Office, village offices or any other Government offices and undertakings of the Government of Tamil Nadu throughout the State of Tamil Nadu, according to the qualification possessed by each candidate, without reference to age in their native, taluk or revenue District. It was further directed that if any one of the MNP who could not be accommodated or is ineligible, the State Governme


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top