SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 415

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, PANKAJ MITHAL
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
P. A. Bhatt – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, AOR Ms. Devyani Bhatt, Adv. Mr. Nirav K Majmudar, Adv. Mr. Priank Adhyaru, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR Mr. Kusum Chaudhary, AOR

JUDGMENT

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

1. These civil appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad confirming the order of the learned Single Judge, holding that the respondents possessing a degree of BAMS (Bachelor of Ayurved in Medicine and Surgery) should be treated at par with the doctors holding MBBS degrees and that they are entitled to the benefits of the recommendations of the Tikku Pay Commission.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. On the basis of a Memorandum of Settlement dated 21.08.1989 entered into by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare with the Joint Action Council of Service Doctors Organisation, a High-Power Committee was constituted on 03.05.1990 with Shri R.K. Tikku as its Chairman, for the purpose of improving the service conditions and prospects of the doctors in Government service.

4. This Committee held 30 meetings during the period from June-1990 to October-1990 and submitted its recommendations under a Report dated 31.10.1990. The recommendations contained in this Report w


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top