IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
UJJAL BHUYAN, N. TUKARAMJI, JJ.
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Department and Others - Appellants
Versus
Mohd. Ibrahim and Others. - Respondents
Writ Appeal No.303 of 2022
Decided On : 09-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 - Article, 226 - Allopathic Institutions - Family Welfare Department - - Held, Court would not be out of place to mention that special emphasis is being given country both by Central Government State Governments for development of indigenous alternative medicine - State students pursuing alternative medicine should be given status and benefits as are being extended students pursuing allopathic medicine - House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Institutions should be treated at par with House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of Allopathic Institutions. If the latter are granted higher stipend, similar benefit should be extended to the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Institutions- Writ appeal being devoid of any merit is hereby dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Ujjal Bhuyan, J.)
1. Heard Ms. Vachepally Usha, learned Assistant Government Pleader attached to the office of learned Additional Advocate General for the appellants and Ms. Tasleem Fatima, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 to 148/writ petitioners.
2. Appellants before us are the State of Telangana in the Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department and its officials.
3. This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 21.01.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing W.P.No.18828 of 2021 filed by respondents No.1 to 148 as the writ petitioners.
4. Respondents No.1 to 148 had filed the related writ petition taking exception to the action of the appellants in not enhancing the stipend paid to them as House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Institutions from the year 2016 onwards at par with House Surgeons and Post Graduate students in Allopathic Institutions under the State of Telangana.
5. It was contended that House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of modern medicine in Allopathic Institutions were sanctioned enhanced stipend vide G.O.Ms.No.88, dated 18.05.2021. Learned Single Judge summed up the grievance of the writ petitioners in the following manner:
4. Subsequently, upon request made by respondent No.3 -the Deputy Director, Department of AYUSH, Hyderabad, for enhancement of stipend to House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Department with effect from 01.01.2008 on par with the Allopathic Department, G.O. Ms. No.65 dated 05.03.2008 and G.O. Ms. No.77 dated 02.03.2009 were issued for payment of stipends to the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Institutions at the enhanced rates i.e., 15% on par with the Internees and Post Graduate students of Allopathic Departments with effect from 01.01.2008.
5. It is submitted that the petitioners had been receiving the stipend irregularly until the Commissioner of AYUSH, Telangana, Hyderabad, requested the Government for enhancement of stipend to the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Department on par with the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of Allopathic Department with effect from 01.01.2012. In pursuance thereof, the Government issued G.O. Ms. No.152 dated 03.11.2016 enhancing stipends to the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of AYUSH Institutions on par with the House Surgeons and Post Graduate students of Allopathic Institutions with effect from 01.01.2014. However, the petitioners have been receiving the stipend irregularly till now without any enhancement.
6. The petitioners submit that in terms of G.O. Ms. No.219 dated 26.07.2004, they are entitled to get stipend at 15% enhancement once in every two years but the Government vide G.O. Ms. No.152 dated 03.11.2016 enhanced the stipend till 2016 and later for the reasons best known to them, did not enhance the stipend in spite of repeated requests. It is the case of the petitioners that Allopathic Institution doctors ha
Point of Law : A mere direction of Supreme Court without laying down any principle of law is not a precedent - It is only where Supreme Court lays down a principle of law that it will amount to a pre....
(1) ‘No work should go unpaid’ should be appropriate doctrine to be followed in these cases where service rendered by respondent doctors have been productive both for patients and also employer.(2) D....
Once it is found that differentiation is based on reasonable classification, decision cannot be held to be violative of principles of equality enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of In....
The classification of AYUSH doctors and doctors under Central Health Service in different categories is discriminatory and unreasonable since doctors under both segments are performing the same funct....
Pay scale – Nature of duties discharged by Post Graduate students in Ayurveda stream is not the same as that of Post Graduate students undertaking therein education in Allopathy stream.
Autonomous institute employees not entitled to Ministry's superannuation age enhancement for direct AYUSH doctors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.