Back
RAMESH SINHA, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Mission Director/Convenor Executive Committee National Health Mission Mandi Bhawan Lko. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Suresh Rai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Vidyarthi, J.
Order on C.M. Application No.2 of 2023:
1. Heard Shri Anil Tiwari, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for appellants, Dr. L.P. Mishra along with Shri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 28, Shri S.B. Pandey, Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing on behalf of respondent No.29-Union of India and Shri Indrajeet Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for State/respondent No.30.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing special appeal.
3. The application is supported with an affidavit, in which the reasons for delay have been explained sufficiently.
4. Accordingly, application is allowed. Delay, if any, in moving this special appeal is hereby condoned.
Order on memo of special appeal:
5. The instant special appeal under Chapter VIII rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court rules has been filed against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2022 passed by Hon'ble single Judge allowing Civil Misc. Review Application No.187 of 2022 reviewing the judgment and order dated 20.10.2022 passed in Writ-A No. 23479 of 2019 and a further prayer has been made for dismissal of the writ petition.
6. The
Point of Law : A mere direction of Supreme Court without laying down any principle of law is not a precedent - It is only where Supreme Court lays down a principle of law that it will amount to a pre....
The classification of AYUSH doctors and doctors under Central Health Service in different categories is discriminatory and unreasonable since doctors under both segments are performing the same funct....
(1) ‘No work should go unpaid’ should be appropriate doctrine to be followed in these cases where service rendered by respondent doctors have been productive both for patients and also employer.(2) D....
The denial of S.A.C.P. benefits to doctors under the Employees State Insurance Scheme violated Article 14 of the Constitution, as they perform the same duties as their counterparts in the Provincial ....
Once it is found that differentiation is based on reasonable classification, decision cannot be held to be violative of principles of equality enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of In....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
