K. M. JOSEPH, B. V. NAGARATHNA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Amod Kumar Kanth – Appellant
Versus
Association of Victim of Uphaar Tragedy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. By the impugned order, the High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for brevity). The petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Metropolitan Magistrate rejecting the closure report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as ‘CBI’ for short) which was filed against the appellant. The closure report filed by the CBI was not accepted by the Magistrate, who instead took cognizance on the protest petition filed by the first respondent before us (Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy). As noted by the learned Judge in the impugned judgment on 13.06.1997, 59 persons lost their lives and over 100 persons received serious injuries while viewing a film sitting in the balcony of Uphaar theater. The unfortunate and tragic incident led to a criminal prosecution against 16 accused. While the trial was ongoing, an application was filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. against inter-alia the present appellant. It is not in dispute that no orders were immediately passed thereon. The tri
D. Devaraja vs. Owais Sabeer Hussain
Indra Devi vs. State of Rajasthan and Another
State of Haryana and Others vs. Bhajan Lal and Others
Abdul Wahab Ansari vs. State of Bihar
Surinderjit Singh Mand vs. State of Punjab
Devinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
Sushil Ansal vs. State through CBI
MCD vs. Uphaar Tragedy Victims Assn. (2011) 14 SCC 481 – Relied [Para 32]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.