SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 668

K. M. JOSEPH, B. V. NAGARATHNA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Amod Kumar Kanth – Appellant
Versus
Association of Victim of Uphaar Tragedy – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. Mr. A.k. Singh, Adv. Ms. Mohini Priya, Adv. Mr. Akshay Sahay, Adv. Ms. Mallika Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Vasudha Jain, Adv. Mr. Mathai M Paikaday, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Adv. Mr. Sajjan Singh Nahar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. KTS Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sukant Vikram, AOR Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv. Mrs. Pallavi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Avish Bhati, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. K. M. Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. T A Khan, Adv. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Adv. Mr. Shantnu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. K.M.nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal, AOR Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Veer Vikrant Singh, Adv. Mr. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, Adv. Mr. KTS Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sukant Vikram, AOR Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv. Mrs. Pallavi Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Avish Bhati, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. By the impugned order, the High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for brevity). The petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Metropolitan Magistrate rejecting the closure report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred to as ‘CBI’ for short) which was filed against the appellant. The closure report filed by the CBI was not accepted by the Magistrate, who instead took cognizance on the protest petition filed by the first respondent before us (Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy). As noted by the learned Judge in the impugned judgment on 13.06.1997, 59 persons lost their lives and over 100 persons received serious injuries while viewing a film sitting in the balcony of Uphaar theater. The unfortunate and tragic incident led to a criminal prosecution against 16 accused. While the trial was ongoing, an application was filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. against inter-alia the present appellant. It is not in dispute that no orders were immediately passed thereon. The tri


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top