SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. GAVAI, J.B. PARDIWALA, JJ.
Haji Iqbal @ Bala – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 2345 of 2023, S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 3613 of 2023
Decided On : 08-08-2023
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 395, 386, 365, 342 and 506 – Constitution of India – Article 226 – Dacoity, extortion, kidnapping, wrongful restraint and criminal intimidation – Quashing of FIR – FIR came to be lodged after a period of almost two years from alleged incident – Even if entire case of prosecution is believed or accepted to be true, none of ingredients to constitute offence of dacoity punishable under Section 395 of IPC is made out – In same manner, none of ingredients to constitute offence punishable under Section 365, 342 and 506 respectively of IPC are disclosed on plain reading of FIR – Entire case put up by first informant on face of it appears to be concocted and fabricated – FIR is nothing but abuse of process of law – Impugned order passed by High Court set aside and criminal proceedings quashed. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 13 and 17)
(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 – Constitution of India – Article 226 – Quashing of criminal proceeding – It will not be just enough for Court to look into averments made in FIR/complaint alone for the purpose of ascertaining whether necessary ingredients to constitute alleged offence are disclosed or not – In frivolous or vexatious proceedings, Court owes a duty to look into many other attending circumstances emerging from record of case over and above averments and, if need be, with due care and circumspection try to read in between lines – Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of Constitution need not restrict itself only to stage of a case but is empowered to take into account overall circumstances leading to initiation/registration of case as well as materials collected in course of investigation. (Para 15)
Facts of the case:
Present appeal is at the instance of one of the accused persons of the First Information Report registered on 10.01.2023 at the Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, State of U.P. and is directed against order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 30.01.2023 in the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 982 of 2023 filed by the appellant herein by which High Court rejected Writ Petition and thereby declined to quash FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 386, 365, 342 and 506 respectively of IPC.
Findings of Court:
Observations made in this judgment are relevant only for the purpose of the FIR in question and consequential criminal proceedings. None of observations shall have any bearing on any of the pending criminal prosecutions or any other proceedings.
Result : Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is at the instance of one of the accused persons of the First Information Report (FIR) No. 0007 of 2023 registered on 10.01.2023 at the Mirzapur Police Station, District Saharanpur, State of U.P. and is directed against the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 30.01.2023 in the Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 982 of 2023 filed by the appellant herein by which the High Court rejected the Writ Petition and thereby declined to quash the FIR for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 386, 365, 342 and 506 resply of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
3. Respondent No. 3 herein is the original first informant. He lodged the FIR in question which reads as thus:
Quashing of criminal proceeding – It will not be just enough for Court to look into averments made in FIR/complaint alone for the purpose of ascertaining whether necessary ingredients to constitute a....
(1) Registration of multiple FIRs assumes importance, thereby attracting issue of wreaking vengeance out of private or personal grudge.(2) Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of....
(1) Mere abuse, discourtesy, rudeness or insolence, may not amount to intentional insult within meaning of Section 504, IPC.(2) Provisions of any criminal statute are to be construed and interpreted ....
(1) Ordinarily, an injured witness would not tell a lie as to actual assailants, but there is no presumption or any basis for assuming that statement of such a witness is always correct or without an....
A mere breach of contract does not preclude a finding of criminal cheating; fraud must be established at the agreement's inception.
inherent power of the High Court in quashing an FIR is distinct and different from the powers given to the Criminal Court for compounding offences under section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.