K. M. JOSEPH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Nitish Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has been denied bail in a case which involves offences under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-State. It is not in dispute that the appellant has been in custody for nearly two years four months. The case is at the stage of trial. Two witnesses have been examined. It is not in dispute that twenty six witnesses are proposed to be examined by the prosecution.
4. In the facts of the case, we are of the view that the appellant is entitled to be released on bail.
5. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The appellant shall be released on bail subject to such conditions as may be stipulated by the Trial Court.
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.