SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 729

K. M. JOSEPH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Nitish Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Anupam Mishra, Jenis V. Francis, Harikumar V.
For the Respondents: Anuvrat Sharma, Alka Singh.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has been denied bail in a case which involves offences under Sections 498A and 304B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent-State. It is not in dispute that the appellant has been in custody for nearly two years four months. The case is at the stage of trial. Two witnesses have been examined. It is not in dispute that twenty six witnesses are proposed to be examined by the prosecution.

4. In the facts of the case, we are of the view that the appellant is entitled to be released on bail.

5. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The appellant shall be released on bail subject to such conditions as may be stipulated by the Trial Court.

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top