SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1408

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. SUNDRESH AND RAJESH BINDAL, JJ.
Saikul @ Sakil - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan And Another - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 184 of 2025 [@ SLP [Crl.] No.15753 of 2024]
Decided on : 10-01-2025

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 201 - Criminal charge for murder and destruction of evidence - The appellant has been in incarceration for over two years, with 22 out of 36 witnesses having testified. No prior criminal records against the appellant, who is implicated under circumstantial evidence - Court considers the duration of imprisonment and pending evidence in granting bail. (Paras 2, 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the appellant is eligible for bail due to the substantial period of incarceration and absence of prior criminal antecedents.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was whether to grant bail to the appellant in light of the circumstances of the case and procedural progress.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that given the appellant's lack of criminal history and the fact that a significant number of witnesses have been examined, it justified granting bail.

Result: The appeal stands allowed and bail is granted to the appellant.

Table of Content
1. charges and circumstances of appellant (Para 2 , 3)
2. granting bail due to circumstances (Para 4)
3. conclusion and order granting bail (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.

3. The appellant has been in incarceration for more than two years. We have been informed that 22 out of 36 witnesses have already been examined. The appellant does not have any prior criminal antecedents, and we are dealing with a case of circumstantial evidence.

4. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant bail to the appellant.

5. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appellant is granted bail, on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

6. The appeal stands allowed accordingly.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top