Back
M. M. SUNDRESH, RAJESH BINDAL
Saikul @ Sakil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. charges and circumstances of appellant (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. granting bail due to circumstances (Para 4) |
| 3. conclusion and order granting bail (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER :
2. The appellant has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860.
4. Considering the above, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and grant bail to the appellant.
6. The appeal stands allowed accordingly.
The court granted bail based on the lengthy incarceration of the appellant and insufficient witness examination, emphasizing the need for timely judicial proceedings.
Bail granted under exceptional circumstances due to lengthy custody and lack of eyewitness in circumstantial evidence case.
Bail – Long period of incarceration as an undertrial prisoner is a valid ground to grant bail.
Prolonged incarceration and hostile witness testimony can justify granting bail to an accused.
The court granted bail to a septuagenarian accused, emphasizing that prolonged detention pending trial is unwarranted, while clarifying that this does not affect the merits of the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
