SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1850

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, JJ.
N. Karthikeyan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 53 of 2022
Decided On : 02-12-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Suhrith Parthasarathy, Advocate, Mr. Shankar Narayanan, Advocate, Ms. Rashmi Nandakumar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advocate, Ms. B.L.N. Shivani, Advocate, Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, AAG, Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., Advocate, Ms. Devyani Gupta, Advocate, Ms. Tanvi Anand, Advocate, Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Advocate, Ms. Nupur Sharmna, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Mahara, Advocate, Ms. Vaidehi Rastogi, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Advocate, Mr. Prateek Bhatia, Advocate, Ms. Mitushi Goyal, Advocate, Mr. P. Wilson, Sr. Advocate, Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Advocate, Ms. G. Indira, Advocate, Mr. Harnaman Singh, Advocate, Mr. P. Gandeepan, Advocate, Ms. Koj Yaajung, Advocate, Mr. Kashyap, Advocate, Mr. Appoorv, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The Court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the judgments in Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association v. Union of India (2021) 6 SCC 568 and Preeti Shrivastava and Another v. State of M.P. (1999) 7 SCC 120, which provided the legal framework for the reservation of Super Specialty seats and the filling of in-service candidate positions.

Headnote:

Reservation - Super Specialty Seats - G.O. No. 462 of 07.11.2020 - Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association v. Union of India (2021) 6 SCC 568, Preeti Shrivastava and Another v. State of M.P. (1999) 7 SCC 120

Fact of the Case:

The State of Tamil Nadu sought clarification on the applicability of a previous order to subsequent academic years. The issue revolved around the reservation of Super Specialty seats and the filling of in-service candidate positions.

Finding of the Court:

The Court permitted the State of Tamil Nadu to fill the reserved seats based on G.O. No. 462 of 07.11.2020 within 15 days. Any remaining unfilled in-service category seats would be filled based on the All India merit list. The main matter was listed for hearing on a future date, and the parties were directed to prepare a single compilation of documents.

Issues: Clarification of applicability of previous order to subsequent academic years, reservation of Super Specialty seats, filling of in-service candidate positions

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment of Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association v. Union of India (2021) 6 SCC 568 was relied upon, and the Court found it to have a direct bearing on the issue. The Court also considered the judgment in the case of Preeti Shrivastava and Another v. State of M.P. (1999) 7 SCC 120.

Final Decision: The application was disposed of with the State of Tamil Nadu being permitted to fill the reserved seats within 15 days and the remaining unfilled in-service category seats to be filled based on the All India merit list. The main matter was listed for future hearing, and the parties were directed to prepare a single compilation of documents.

ORDER

IA No. 185985/2022 in W.P.(C) NO.53/2022

1. The State of Tamil Nadu has approached this Court with this I.A. for clarification of the order dated 16.03.2022 that the said order is also applicable to all subsequent academic years, till the disposal of the present writ petition.

2. We have heard Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, learned AAG for the State of Tamil Nadu, Mr. P. Willson, learned senior counsel for in- service candidates in one of the petitions, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General of India for the Union of India and Mr. Devadatt Kamat, learned senior counsel appearing for the non in-service candidates.

3. Ms. Bhati submits that in the last year, number of seats reserved for in-service candidates could not be filled up. It is submitted that the Super Specialty seats are valuable and a national asset, and they cannot be permitted to remain vacant. Ms. Bhati further submits that the Union of India on an All-India basis does not permit any in-service reservation.

4. While passing the order on 16.03.2022, we have, prima facie, relied on the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court of Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association v. Union of India, reported in (2021) 6 SCC 568. The judgment in the case of Preeti Shrivastava and Another v. State of M.P., reported in (1999) 7 SCC 120, was also pressed into service, at that stage, by the learned ASG as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of various in-service candidates.

5. However, we find that the judgment in the case of Tamil Nadu Medical Officers Association (supra) had a direct bearing on the issue for consideration before this Court.

6. We appreciate the anxiety expressed by the learned ASG that the issue requires to be decided finally.

7. However, insofar as the present academic year is concerned, we find that the State of Tamil Nadu needs to be permitted to fill in the post on the basis of the G.O. No. 462 of 07.11.2020. Insofar as the apprehension of the learned ASG with regard to the seats remaining vacant is concerned, we find that certain directions could be issued to ensure that the seats do not remain vacant.

8. We, therefore, permit the State of Tamil Nadu to fill in the seats reserved on the basis of G.O. No. 462 dated 07.11.2020, within a period of 15 days from today. On the 16th day from today, the State of Tamil Nadu will inform the Union of India with regard to all the seats which remain unfilled from the in-service category, which shall be permitted to be filled in by the Union of India, on the basis of All India merit list.

9. List the main matter i.e. W.P. (c) No. 53/2022 for hearing on 14.02.2023. To be listed at Serial No.1.

10. We further direct that the parties prepare a single convenience compilation of the documents, on which the parties would rely. On behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., and for Union of India, Mr. G.S. Makker, would work jointly to prepare the said compilation.

11. The application is, accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top