IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, JJ.
K. Brahmaiah S/o K. Kotaiah – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 5059 of 2022
Decided On : 14-03-2022
Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 - Section 95 - Andhra Pradesh Medical Colleges (Admission into Postgraduate Medical Courses) Rules, 1997 - Rule 3 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 – Equality before Law - Held, NTR Health University would submit that the process for filling up the seats for in-service candidates is already over, at this stage, the petitioners cannot be allowed to claim seat in the in-service quota - However, he would fairly submit that if the petitioners make any representation for considering their case on any permissible ground in the left over vacancies still available for admission, the same shall be considered in accordance with law - Court deem it appropriate to dispose of writ petition with the observation that the petitioners shall file their representations before respondent No. 4/NTR Health University within one week from today, if so advised, and on filing such representations, the same shall be considered by the NTR Health University sympathetically and in accordance with law within 15 days thereafter, subject to availability of seats - Writ petition disposed of.
ORDER :
1. This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:
(a) consequently, direct the respondent No. 4 to implement the in-service quota reservation for the petitioners as local in-service in the matter of admission to the Post Graduate Medical Courses for the academic year 2021-22.
(b) consequently, set aside impugned G.O.Ms. No. 150, dated 11.12.2021 and the prospective notification vide No. 1236/EA2/PG/2021 dated 23.12.2021.
(c) consequently, set aside the college wise allotment list published by the respondent No. 4 on 13.02.2022 and 21.02.2022 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and utter.
(d) consequently, direct the respondent No. 4 to consider the petitioners’ request and consider them for the admission into PG Medical Courses in Andhra Pradesh under local in-service quota since the petitioners have been serving in SCCL, Telangana continually from past 10 years to till today and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are working in a Hospital under Singareni Collories Company Limited, which has been treated to be one of the organizations the services in which have been treated as continuous regular service in the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh by way of G.O.Ms. No. 155 dated 18.11.2021 by the Department of Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department, Government of Telangana. He would submit that on account of the said G.O. the petitioners are fully eligible and qualified for being considered as in-service candidates for admission to Post Graduation degree. However, their names have not been considered for admission to the said course. According to him, about 250 seats are still available, but they have been converted to non-service quota seats.
3. On the other hand, Mr. G. Vijaya Kumar, learned standing counsel for the NTR Health University would submit that the process for filling up the seats for in-service candidates is already over on 22.02.2022, therefore, at this stage, the petitioners cannot be allowed to claim seat in the in-service quota. However, he would fairly submit that if the petitioners make any representation for considering their case on any permissible ground in the left over vacancies still available for admission, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the petitioners shall file their representations before the respondent No. 4/NTR Health University within one week from today, if so advised, and on fil
In order to ensure equal opportunities for quality higher education to all students in the successor States, the existing admission quotas in all government or private, aided or unaided, institutions....
The court upheld the amendments to the P.G. Rules imposing an upper age limit and extended service period for in-service candidates, ruling them as non-arbitrary and justified.
Merit must prevail in admission to postgraduate medical courses; state can implement service quotas, but must not dilute merit standards.
The court affirmed equal treatment in education admission policies, mandating inclusion of candidates from outside the state who meet residency criteria.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that while the Ext.P9 Prospectus violated merit-based admission criteria, the splitting up of in-service quota seats and provision of service weigh....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.