HIMA KOHLI, RAJESH BINDAL
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Bhupendra Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HIMA KOHLI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. A challenge has been laid in the present appeal to the judgement dated 24th January, 2018, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior, dismissing the appeal1[Writ Appeal No. 46 of 2018] filed by the appellant – State Government against the order dated 17th November, 2017, passed by the learned Single Judge in a writ petition2[Writ Petition No. 19621 of 2017] and relegating the matter back to the competent authority for passing a fresh order.
3. We may first allude to the relevant facts of the case.
3.1 In May, 2015, a criminal case3[Vide Crime No.64/2015, registered at PS Isagarh, District Ashoknagar, under Sections 341, 354 (D), 323, 34 IPC and under Sections 7, 8 and 11(d)/12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, for short ‘the POCSO Act’.] was registered against the respondent who was arrayed as an accused in a Special Sessions Case4[Special Sessions Case No. 16 of 2015 instituted on 21st May, 2015] in the Court of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Ashok Nagar (MP). Charges
Commissioner of Police, New Delhi and Another v. Mehar Singh
Avatar Singh v. Union of India and Others
Union Territory, Chandigarh Administration and Others v. Pradeep Kumar and Others
Pawan Kumar v. Union of India and Another
Jainendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Daya Shankar Yadav. v. Union of India and Others
State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Abhijit Singh Pawar
R.K. Kapur v. Union of Indian and Another
State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Parvez Khan
Rajasthan Rajya Vidhut Prasaran Nigam Limited and Another v. Anil Kanwaria
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.