SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 688

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Sujoy Paul, A.C.J., Chaitali Chatterjee Das, J.
Association For Protection Of Democratic Rights & Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.A.(P) 259 of 2021
Decided On : 21-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Mahaboob Ahmed, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Alok Kr. Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Subhrangsu Panda, Adv.

The court mandated compliance with compensation directives and safety regulations for laborers engaged in hazardous work, emphasizing the state’s duty to protect fundamental rights.

Headnote:(A) Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 - Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17, 21, 23 - Unnatural deaths of laborers engaged in hazardous work - Petition under public interest litigation for compensation and directed investigation - Court emphasized negligence in adhering to statutory duties and Supreme Court directions ensuring adequate compensation and a regular monitoring mechanism for safety of laborers. (Paras 10-20)

(B) Public Interest Litigation - Maintaining public interest while ensuring preventable deaths in hazardous employment - Court cautioned against malafide petitions but highlighted the urgent need for adherence to rights regarding safety and compensation. (Paras 1, 8, 10, 22)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners filed a public interest litigation after four laborers died and others were injured due to negligence while desilting sewers, seeking compensation and actions against responsible parties - Compensation inadequately provided and no investigation initiated.

Findings of Court:
Authorities directed to pay Rs.5 lakhs to injured workers and Rs.30 lakhs to families of deceased, establishing a committee for oversight in compliance with the Act of 2013.

Issues: The core issues involved the adequacy of compensation under Supreme Court directives and the institutional neglect for workers’ safety.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated the responsibility of state and local authorities to ensure safety standards and compliance with compensation directives, emphasizing the urgent need for systemic reforms to protect vulnerable workers.

Result: Petition allowed; state authorities directed to comply with compensation orders and oversight mechanisms.

Table of Content
1. public interest litigation initiated due to deaths of labourers. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments on the maintainability and engineering negligence in the incident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. discussion on the responsibilities of kmc and legal precedents. (Para 7 , 12 , 14 , 19)
4. court's acknowledgment of ongoing human rights concerns surrounding manual scavenging. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 20)
5. final directives for compensation and establishment of oversight mechanisms. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS, J.

1. This public interest litigation has been filed by the petitioner pertaining to unnatural deaths of four labourers and the injuries sustained by other four labourers who were engaged in de-silting of underground sewer line in South Kolkata, which was carried out under a project of Kolkata environment, Infrastructure Improvement Project (KEIIP) which functions under the KMC.

Brief resume of the case

2. The petitioner no.1 being the Association for Protection of Democratic Rights Organisation (APDR) in the country is a non-governmental organisation of conscious citizens, espoused various issues of public interest to the notice of the court, where government administration fails to maintain its constitutional and legal obligations and protect and secure the interest of the citizen. The petitioner no. 2 is a non-civil right activist and post editorial contributor to vernacular newspaper including daily newspaper Ananda Bazar. The petitioner became aware of the case of death of manual scavengers at khudghat as a result death of 4 persons took place and 3 persons sustained serious injury. The incident occurred on 25th of February 2021, while working on de-silting of underground sewer line in South Kolkata. This public interest litigation has been filed with a prayer for an independent investigation to be directed to conduct pertaining to the incident occurred on June 25, 2021 to investigate the events surrounding the unnatural death and injuries of the victims. Further prayed for interim compensation of at least Rs.16 lakhs to each of the family members of the deceased victims and Rs.5 lakhs to the injured victims and also for a direction to take action against the persons found responsible for the incident in accordance with law.

Submissions made by KMC

3. The Learned Advocate representing the petitioner no.2 to 6 at the outset has taken a point on the ground of maintainability of this Public Interest Litigation by the petitioner organisation as they are busy body ,acting with malafide intention and has been filed with a desire to gain publicity and cheap popularity .They have no locus to file this petition.

4. It is further assailed that the work of desilting was carried out under a project of Kolkata Environmental Infrastructure Improvement Project (KEIIP) which functions under the KMC. It is contended that the incident happened as there was no qualified engineer to supervise the workers which violated all safety rules and the labourers who entered into the underground pit to connect drainage pumping station with sewerage line became unconscious after inhaling toxic fumes, and drowning in the sewer sludge. After the incident was reported in the media, including print media, the chairman of KMC board of administrator constituted a three member committee comprising controlling officers, DG, KEIIP, DG, KMC drainage, and sewage and DG. KMC project development to prove into the matter and based on the findings, the contractor of the project to be penalised and if he found guilty appropriate criminal action will be taken against them. They contractor was asked to pay Rs.5,00,000 each to the families of the deceased. However no person was arrested in connection with the incident. The petitioner sought for certain information regarding its functioning and report by filing his application under the Right to Information Act dated September 8, 2021, but no such information has yet been received. Over su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top