SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1145

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HRISHIKESH ROY, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL, MANOJ MISRA
Subhagam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature at Patna through Its Registrar General – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv., Ms. Padma Priya, Adv., Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv., Mr. Suyash Jain, Adv., Mr. Chirag Kalani, Adv., Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR, Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh , AOR, Ms. Neelam Rathore, Adv., Ms. Sandhya Kohli, Adv., Mr. Lovekesh Aggarwal, Adv., Mr. Shubham Seth, Adv., Mr. Anuj Panwar, Adv., Mr. Nikilesh Ramachandran, AOR, Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, AOR, Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv., Mr. Anand Kumar, Adv., Ms. Jaya Kiran, Adv., Ms. Jyoti Singh, Adv., Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Pritish Roy, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Adv., Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv., Mr. Abhaya Nath Das, Adv., Mr. Yogendra Kumar Verma, Adv., Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR, Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Adv., Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR, Mr. Vivek Kumar, Adv., Mr. Naik H.k., Adv., Mr. Ajay Amritraj, Adv., Mr. Chetan Garg, Adv., Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Adv., Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, AOR, Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Mohan Kumar, AOR, Mr. Anurag Katarki, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv., Ms. Neetu Singh, Adv., Ms. Asia Beg, Adv., Mr. Vivek Narayan Sharma, Adv., Mrs. Mahima Bhardwaj Kalucha, Adv., Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Adv., Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv., Ms. Laksha Bhavnani, Adv., Mr. Adhiraj Wadhera, Adv., Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv., Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR, Mrs. Haripriya Padmanabhan, Adv., Mr. Kuriakose Varghese, Adv., Mr. V. Shyamohan, Adv., Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Adv., Ms. Aishwarya Hariharan, Adv., Mr. Vishal Sinha, Adv., Mr. Akshat Gogna, Adv., Ms. Isha Ghai, Adv., For M/S. Kmnp Law, Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv., Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR, Ms. Mallika Agarwal, Adv., Mr. P.V. Dinesh, AOR, Ms. Oommen Anna A, Adv., Ms. Urvashi Chauhan, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG, Ms. Diksha Rai, AOR, Ms. Ragini Pandey, Adv., Mr. P. I. Jose, AOR, Mr. James P. Thomas, Adv., Mr. Ravi Sagar, Adv., Mr. Remish Lakra, Adv., Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. Nikhil Goel, AOR, Ms. Naveen Goel, Adv., Mr. Kartik Kaushal, Adv., Mr. Adhitya Koshy Roy, Adv., Ms. Sidhi Gupta, Adv., Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, Adv., Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR, Mr. Rashika Swarup, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR, Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR, Mr. Debojit Borkakati, AOR, Mr. Lalit Kumar, AOR, Mr. Anil Kumar, AOR.

ORDER :

1. The issue which has been raised in the reference to the Constitution Bench in Tej Prakash Pathak Vs. Rajasthan High Court, Civil Appeal No. 2634 of 2013 does not arise in the present case.

2. Hence, the Writ Petition is de-tagged from the batch of matters and shall be placed before an appropriate two-Judge Bench by the Registry at an early date within two weeks.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top