D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HRISHIKESH ROY, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL, MANOJ MISRA
Subhagam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature at Patna through Its Registrar General – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The issue which has been raised in the reference to the Constitution Bench in Tej Prakash Pathak Vs. Rajasthan High Court, Civil Appeal No. 2634 of 2013 does not arise in the present case.
2. Hence, the Writ Petition is de-tagged from the batch of matters and shall be placed before an appropriate two-Judge Bench by the Registry at an early date within two weeks.
Issue raised in reference to Constitution Bench must directly arise in the present case
The court emphasized the importance of aligning the issues raised in a case with the reference to a Constitution Bench and the need to resolve differences of opinion through appropriate bench formati....
The court recognizes the importance of maintaining judicial dignity and outlines procedures to ensure accountability in cases of contempt, recalling its order to allow for proper jurisdictional handl....
Point of law: Election – Disqualification - No perversity - Speaker passed the impugned disqualification order after taking into consideration all the pleadings, newspaper reports, the photographs an....
The court cannot decide on the importance or complexity of a case without considering the merits of the connected petitions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.