D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, HRISHIKESH ROY, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, PANKAJ MITHAL, MANOJ MISRA
Tej Prakash Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court – Respondent
ORDER :
SLP(C) No. 21592/2013, SLP(C) No. 29275/2013, SLP(C) No. 31763/2013
1. Delay condoned.
2. The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed in terms of the signed order.
3. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No. 735/2021, W.P.(C) No. 1073/2022, W.P.(C) No. 1146/2022
4. In terms of the signed order, these petitions shall be delinked from the batch of cases and shall be placed before a bench of two-Judges after seeking directions on the administrative side. The Registry shall do so within a period of two weeks.
C.A. No. 4403/2023 (@SLP(C) No. 4999/2018)
5. Leave granted.
6. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No. 421/2016
8. In terms of the signed order, the Writ Petition is de-tagged from the batch of matters and shall be placed before an appropriate two-Judge Bench by the Registry at an early date within two weeks.
W.P.(C) No. 165/2017
9. The Writ Petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
10. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Civil Appeal No(s).2634/2013, C.A. No. 2636/2013, C.A. No.2635/2013
11. Arguments heard in part.
12. List the appeals for further hearing on 18 July 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.