RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Dinesh Chandra @ Dinesh Chandra Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial context of the case proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding maintainability under article 226. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal arguments on the applicability of past judgments. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. distinction between civil and revenue courts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. clarification on writ jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. jurisdiction under article 227 for revenue court orders. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. conclusion on maintainability of writ petitions. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. conclusion and future proceedings. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
In the present matter, the question of maintainability has been raised, therefore, the Members of the Bar have been permitted to address the Court. Pursuant thereto, Shri M.E. Khan has argued on behalf of the petitioners assisted by other counsels of the writ petitioners, Shri Shailendra Kumar Singh, Chief Standing Counsel-II assisted by Shri Rohit Nandan Shukla, Shri R.C. Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Shri Upendra Singh, Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel have argued the case on behalf of the State
Hukumchand Mills Ltd. v. State of M.P.
In Re: Kiran Devi v. The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board
In Re: Radhey Shyam v. Chhabi Nath
In Re: Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Mahendra Saree Emporium (2) v. G.V. Srinivasa Murthy
Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad v. Ben Hiraben Manilal
Nani Gopal Biswas v. Municipality of Howrah
Ouseph Mathai v. M. Abdul Khadir
Salem Advocate Bar Assn. (2) v. Union of India
Sameer Suresh Gupta v. Rahul Kumar Agarwal
High Courts exercise original jurisdiction under Article 226, while Article 227's jurisdiction is supervisory, allowing distinct legal remedies against tribunal orders.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, but revenue courts' orders can be challenged under Article 227.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, with Article 227 providing distinct jurisdiction.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, affirming the distinct nature of Article 227.
Judicial orders of civil courts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226; challenges must be made through appeal or revision, with Article 227 providing distinct jurisdiction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.