SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 30

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA, PANKAJ MITHAL, JJ.
S. Rajaseekaran – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Kishan Chand Jain - Applicant
I.A. No.71387 of 2023 in Writ Petition (C) No. 295 of 2012
Decided on : 12-01-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR (Amicus Curiae), Mr. Krishna Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR Ms. Prerna Mehta, AOR Ms. G. Indira, AOR Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Adv. Ms. Jaikriti S. Jadeja, AOR Mr. Nitin Lonkar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Raavi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv. Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv. Mr. KV Girish Chowdary, Adv. Mr. Meeran Maqbool, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Abraham C. Mathew, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajaselvan, Adv. Mr. Kishan Chand Jain, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. V. Shyamohan, AOR Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apurv Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Rohan Darade, Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar-I, AOR Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Manya Hasija, Adv. Mr. Tejasvi Gupta, Adv. Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. T. Illayarasu, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Adv. Mr. Karan Bishnoi, Adv. Mr. Rajesh S. Pandian, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. S.K. Rajora, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Virendra Mohan, Adv. Ms. Komal, Adv. Mr. S. Satialon, Adv. Mr. B. Balaji, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Dr. Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Mr. M.P. Vinod, AOR Mr. Atul Shankar Vinod, Adv. Mr. Dileep Pillai, Adv. Mr. Ajay K. Jain, Adv. Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh, A.A.G. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Priyanshu Malik, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kishore, AOR Mr. Raghvendra Kumar, AOR Mr. Anand Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Simanta Kumar, Adv. Ms. K. Enatoli Sema, AOR Ms. Limayinla Jamir, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Chubalemla Chang, Adv. Mr. Prang Newmai, Adv. Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv. Ms. Swati Jain, Adv. Ms. Pooja Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Tejaswin Suri, Adv. Mr. Aravindh S., AOR Mr. Abbas, Adv. Ms. Kavya Geetha, Adv. Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, A.A.G. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Ms. Devyani Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv. Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv. Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv. M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR Mr. Sanjay Jain, AOR Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR Mr. Srisatya Mohanty, Adv. Ms. Anju Thomas, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Mantika Haryani, Adv. Mr. Shreyas Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Chakravarty, Adv. Ms. Ripul Swati Kumari, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Mishra, Adv. Ms. Muskan Surana, Adv. Ms. Anvita Dwivedi, Adv. Ms. Lihzu Shiney Konyak, Adv.

IMPORTANT POINT
Hit and Run motor accidents – Value of money diminishes with time – Central Government must consider whether compensation amounts can be gradually enhanced annually.

Headnote:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sections 161 and 163 – Hit and Run motor accidents – In terms of sub-Section (3) of Section 161, Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 has been brought into force with effect from 1st April 2022 – It superseded Solatium Scheme, 1989 framed under unamended sub-Section (1) of Section 163 of MV Act – An accident involving a motor vehicle can be considered as a hit and run accident, provided identity of vehicle that caused accident cannot be ascertained despite reasonable efforts – If Police conclude that it is a case of hit and run accident, Police must inform victim or legal representatives of victim, as the case may be, about availability of the Scheme – However, no efforts are made to ensure that persons entitled to seek compensation file their claims – Many victims may not be aware of their right to apply under Solatium Scheme – Standing Committee may also issue directions for effective implementation of Scheme – Standing Committee shall issue elaborate directions for developing public awareness and for sensitisation of members of public about the Scheme – Value of money diminishes with time – Central Government directed to consider whether compensation amounts can be gradually enhanced annually – Central Government shall take an appropriate decision on this issue within eight weeks from today. (Paras 3, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10 and 11)

Facts of the case:

Question of issuing interim directions for effective implementation of provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 relating to the grant of compensation in case of hit and run motor accidents.

Findings of Court:

Copies of compliance reports by various authorities reporting compliance with directions mentioned above shall be provided by concerned authorities to Amicus Curiae and Counsel representing the parties.

Result : Directions issued. Matter listed for next hearing.

ORDER :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1) We have heard the learned counsel on the question of issuing interim directions for the effective implementation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the MV Act’) relating to the grant of compensation in case of hit and run motor accidents.

2) Section 161 of the MV Act, as applicable from 1st April 2022, reads thus:

“161. Special provisions as to compensation in case of hit and run motor accident.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having the force of law, the Central Government shall provide for paying in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the Scheme made under sub-section (3), compensation in respect of the death of, or grievous hurt to, persons resulting from hit and run motor accidents. (2) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the Scheme made under sub-section (3), there shall be paid as compensation,—

(a) in respect of the death of any person resulting from a hit and run motor accident, a fixed sum of two lakh rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed by the Central Government;

(b) in respect of grievous hurt to any person resulting from a hit and run motor accident, a fixed sum of fifty thousand rupees or such higher amount as may be prescribed by the Central Government.

(3) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make a Scheme specifying the manner in which the Scheme shall be administered by the Central Government or General Insurance Council, the form, manner and the time within which applications for compensation may be made, the officers or authorities to whom such applications may be made, the procedure to be followed by such officers or authorities for considering and passing orders on such applications, and all other matters connected with, or incidental to, the administration of the Scheme and the payment of compensation under this section.

(4) A Scheme made under sub-section (3) may provide that,—

(a) a payment of such sum as may be prescribed by the Central Government as interim relief to any claimant under such Scheme;

(b) a contravention of any provision thereof shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to two years, or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but may extend to five lakh rupees or with both;

(c) the powers, functions or duties conferred or imposed on any officer or authority by such Scheme may be delegated with the prior approval in writing of Central Government, by such officer or authority to any other officer or authority.”

3) In terms of sub-Section (3) of Section 161, the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022 (for short, ‘the Scheme’) has been brought into force with effect from 1st April 2022. It superseded the Solatium Scheme, 1989 (the Solatium Scheme) framed under unamended sub-Section (1) of Section 163 of the MV Act. The broad framework of the Scheme can be summarised as follows;

a) The Scheme provides for the setting up of the Standing Committee and District Level Committees. The Standing Committee is at the central level. The primary duty of the Standing Committee is to periodically review the working of the Scheme, including consideration of the report of the General Insurance Council. The Standing Committee has the power to direct corrective steps to be taken. Another important function assigned to the Standing Committee is to make recommendations to the Central Government for the amendment of the Scheme for its better and more effective implementation;

b) The District Level Committees are under a mandate to evaluate the progress of the Scheme's implementation in the concerned district and take corrective measures. Each District Level Committee is under an obligation to submit a report to the Standing Committee every quarter. The report must incl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top