SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, CJI., PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JJ.
The State Of Telangana – Petitioner
Versus
Secretary To Her Excellency The Hon’ble Governor For The State Of Telangana & Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No.333 Of 2023 (With IA No.59530 Of 2023 - Intervention/Impleadment)
Decided On : 24-04-2023
Article 200 - Assent to Bills - The court discussed the provisions of Article 200 of the Constitution, particularly the first proviso which allows the Governor to return a non-Money Bill with a message for reconsideration to the State Legislature. The court emphasized the constitutional significance of the expression 'as soon as possible' and its impact on the actions of constitutional authorities.
Fact of the Case:
The communication from the Secretary to the Governor of Telangana provided the updated status of pending bills with the Governor, indicating that no bill was pending without action. As a result, the court found it unnecessary to dwell further on the issues raised in the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition, leaving the issues open to be decided in an appropriate case, as no bill was pending with the Governor without action.
Issues: The issues sought to be raised in the petition were left open for consideration in an appropriate case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the constitutional significance of the expression 'as soon as possible' in Article 200 and found it unnecessary to dwell further on the issues raised in the petition due to the absence of pending bills with the Governor.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and any pending applications were also disposed of.
ORDER :
1. Article 200 of the Constitution provides as follows :
“200. Assent to Bills.- When a Bill has been passed by the Legislative Assembly of a State or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, has been passed by both Houses of the Legislature of the State, it shall be presented to the Governor and the Governor shall declare either that he assents to the Bill or that he withholds assent therefrom or that he reserves the Bill for the consideration of the President:
Provided that the Governor may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill together with a message requesting that the House or Houses will reconsider the Bill or any specified provisions thereof and, in particular, will consider the desirability of introducing any such amendments as he may recommend in his message and, when a Bill is so returned, the House or Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the House or Houses with or without amendment and presented to the Governor for assent, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom:
Provided further that the Governor shall not assent to, but shall reserve for the consideration of the President, any Bill which in the opinion of the Governor would, if it became law, so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger the position which that Court is by this Constitution designed to fill.”
2. The first proviso to Article 200 states that the Governor may “as soon as possible after the presentation” of the Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill together with a message for reconsideration to the House or Houses of the State Legislature. The expression “as soon as possible” has significant constitutional content and must be borne in mind by constitutional authorities.
3. The communication dated 23 April 2023 of the Secretary to the Governor of Telangana to the Solicitor General of India, which is placed on the record, contains the following updated status in respect of the bills which were pending with the Governor:
“The following bills are returned with messages of the Hon’ble Governor:
1) The Telangana Municipal Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2022 (L.A. Bill No.7 of 2022)
2) The Telangana Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) (Amendment) Bill, 2022 (L.A. Bill No.8 of 2022)
In the Telangana State Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) (Amendment) Bill, 2022 (L.A. Bill No.12 of 2022)the Hon’ble Governor have sought certain additional information and the same has been called for from the State Government.
In the Telangana Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Bill, 2023 (L.A. Bill No.2 of 2023) certain clarifications were sought from the State Government and the same are awaited.
Therefore action has been taken on all the bills and no bill is pending without action.
The Azamabad Industrial Area (Termination and Regulation of Leases) (Amendment) Bill, 2022 (L.A. Bill No.6 of 2022) said to have been with the Hon’ble Governor in fact is not yet submitted by the Law Department to the Hon’ble Governor for consideration and assent.”
4. In view of the above factual position, since no Bill is pending with the Governor “without action” as recorded above, it does not become necessary to dwell any further on the issues sought to be raised in the Petition, at this stage. They are left open to be decided in an appropriate case.
5. The Petition is accordingly disposed of.
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
AI
The constitutional significance of the expression 'as soon as possible' in Article 200 and the impact on the actions of constitutional authorities.
The Governor holds discretionary power under Article 200 and is not mandated to adhere to a set timeframe for assenting bills.
Courts cannot direct the Governor to grant assent to a Bill, as it is within the Governor's discretion.
The Governor is not empowered to withhold action on the Bills passed by the State Legislature and must act 'as soon as possible'. The Speaker is legally permissible to reconvene the sitting of the Vi....
The Governor has discretion under Articles 163 and 171 of the Constitution but must act on Cabinet recommendations, which can be withdrawn before a formal decision is made.
The Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 171(5), with judicial review permitted in cases of ultra vires actions or mala fides.
The Governor's nominations under Article 171(5) require adherence to constitutional procedures, with judicial review available for actions deemed ultra vires or in bad faith.
The Governor is bound by the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, but his formal authorization is required for release, as observed in Maru Ram v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 2147.
The Governor's formal authorization was required for release, despite the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, and the court did not have the power to direct release without the Governor's acc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.