D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI.)
Table of Contents
| Table of Contents |
| I. Factual background |
| II. Submissions |
| III. Analysis A. The Governor is a symbolic head and cannot withhold action on Bills passed by the State Legislature B. Reconvening a sitting of the Vidhan Sabha which has not been prorogued is permissible in law and is within the exclusive domain of the Speaker 1. Distinction between adjournment and prorogation 2. Exclusive domain of the Speaker to regulate the procedure of the House |
| IV. Conclusion |
1. The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution has been invoked by the State of Punjab. The Government of Punjab is aggrieved on the ground that the Governor did not (i) assent to four Bills which were passed by the Vidhan Sabha nor have they been returned; and (ii) furnish a recommendation for the introduction of certain Money Bills in the Vidhan Sabha.
I. Factual background
2. On 22 February 2023, the Council of Ministers of the Government of Punjab forwarded a recommendation to the Governor of Punjab seeking th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.