B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Binu Tamta – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. We have heard learned senior counsel Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija who is petitioner No.2, appearing-in-person on the application being Miscellaneous Application No.2308/2023 filed by her. The prayers sought in the application read as follows:
a. Pass directions as prayed for in Paragraph 25 in the present Application being:
I) Direct that references to “aggrieved woman” [as defined in Regulation 2(a)] be supplanted with “aggrieved persons” to reflect the gender-neutral protection of the Regulations;
II) Direct that “sexual harassment” be defined in gender-neutral terms to bring within its purview acts of sexual harassment committed by Respondents of the same sex as the “aggrieved person”;
III) Direct that Regulations be amended as necessary to ensure that the Regulations permit persons of all gender to avail the redressal mechanism provided therein;
IV) Direct that reports be furnished regarding the carrying out of sensitization activities, outlining the applicable policy (if any), frequency of such activities and publication thereof; and
V) Direct the formulation of a committee to assess the adequacy of the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.