ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Kishore – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABHAY S. OKA, J.
FACTUAL ASPECTS
1. The appellants are the accused nos. 2, 3 and 5-Kishore, Bala and Banaras respectively. Five accused faced trial for the offences punishable under Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘the IPC’) Section 460 read with Section 149 of the IPC and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC. All the five accused were convicted. For the offences punishable under Section 148 of the IPC, they were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two years. For the second offence punishable under Section 460, read with Section 149 of the IPC, they were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years. For the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the IPC, they were sentenced to undergo life imprisonment.
2. The accused preferred an appeal before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. By the impugned judgment dated 27th April 2010, the High Court acquitted the accused no. 1-Raka and the accused no. 4-Lakhan but confirmed the conviction of the present appellants.
3. According to the prosecution case, on the intervening night of 3rd and 4th July 2003, PW-8 (Khushbir Singh) was sleeping with his pare
Test Identification Parade – Test identification parade is not mandatory – Test identification parade is a part of investigation – It is useful when eyewitnesses do not know accused before incident.
The court established that a conviction cannot rely on identification that lacks corroboration from earlier proceedings, particularly when witnesses could not confidently identify masked assailants.
Murder - Unless eyewitnesses identify accused present in Court, it cannot be said that, based on testimony of eyewitnesses, guilt of accused has been proved.
(1) It is very unsafe to record a conclusion based only on testimony of solitary witness that guilt of accused was proved beyond reasonable doubt when no identification parade was held.(2) Common obj....
The judgment underscores the requirement for clear and credible evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases involving serious charges.
The reliability of eye-witness testimonies and the test identification parade in establishing the guilt of the accused.
Eyewitness testimony, even from an interested witness, can sustain a conviction if corroborated by credible evidence and circumstances.
The importance of victim testimony, identification of accused, and the relevance of Test Identification Parade in criminal cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.