SURYA KANT, K. V. VISWANATHAN
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Gurpreet Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surya Kant, J.
Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 05.12.2019, passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), allowing Criminal Appeal, CRAD1606DB2015 (O&M) filed by Gurpreet Singh, Kashmira Singh and Jagdeep Singh (Respondent Nos. 13) and Criminal Revision, CRR29422015 (O&M) filed by Harpreet Singh against their conviction awarded by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana (hereinafter, ‘Trial Court’) vide judgments dated 29.09.2015 and 02.07.2015 respectively. The High Court has, through the impugned judgment, acquitted all the four Respondents of the charges under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter, ‘IPC’).
FACTS:
4. At this juncture, it is imperative to delve into the factual matrix to set out the context of the present proceedings.
5. FIR No. 100 dated 18.07.2012, was registered at Police Station City Jagraon, District Ludhiana Rural, under Sections 302 and 34 of IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54, and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959. The subject FIR was lodged on the statement of Gursewak Singh (P.W.2), the Complainant, who stated th
State of Karnataka v. J. Jayalalitha
Rajesh Prasad v. State of Bihar
Thoti Manohar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Nand Lal v. State of Chhattisgarh
Thulia Kali v. State of Tamil Nadu (1972) 3 SCC 393 [Para 30] – Relied.
State of Punjab v. Surja Ram 1995 Supp (3) SCC 419 [Para 30] – Relied.
Girish Yadav v. State of M.P. (1996) 8 SCC 186 [Para 30] – Relied.
Takdir Samsuddin Sheikh v. State of Gujarat (2011) 10 SCC 158 [Para 30] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.