D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Kavita Kamboj – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. high court's recommendation for judicial appointments reviewed. (Para 2) |
| 2. procedure for appointment by promotion defined (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. revised eligibility criteria for promotion (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. procedural requirements for promotions outlined. (Para 13) |
| 5. controversy regarding candidates' promotion recommendations (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. union's opinion on eligibility criteria consultation (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. petition filed for mandamus on recommendations (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. arguments from candidates against eligibility criteria (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. historical context on recruitment procedures (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. classification of recruitment sources and evaluation methods (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 11. reasoning supporting eligibility cut-off requirements (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 12. administrative instructions can fill legal gaps (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 13. legitimacy of minimum cut-offs discussed (Para 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 14. constitutional provisions on appointments and consultation (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 15. affirmation of the high court's decision (Para 67 , 68 , 69) |
JUDGMENT :
| Table of Contents | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.