SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 217

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Kavita Kamboj – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. Ms. Shristi Jain Goyal, D.A.G. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Gupta, Adv. Mr. P S Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Udayaditya Arpith, Adv. Ms. Trisha Chandran, Adv. Mr. Nishant Singh, AOR Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Arpith Jacob Varaprasad, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sidhant Awasthy, Adv. Mrs. Eliza Bar, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Saroha, Adv. Mr. Manav Bhalla, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jaspreet Singh Rai, Adv. Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Jitesh Malik, Adv. Mr. Jasdeep Singh Dhillon, Adv. Mrs. Sukhdeep Kaur Rai, Adv. Mrs. Vasudha Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Vasudha Nagpal, Adv. Mr. Linoy Varghese, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankur Singh, Adv. Mr. Shwetabh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shyamal Kumar, AOR

Table of Content
1. high court's recommendation for judicial appointments reviewed. (Para 2)
2. procedure for appointment by promotion defined (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. revised eligibility criteria for promotion (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. procedural requirements for promotions outlined. (Para 13)
5. controversy regarding candidates' promotion recommendations (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. union's opinion on eligibility criteria consultation (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
7. petition filed for mandamus on recommendations (Para 21 , 22)
8. arguments from candidates against eligibility criteria (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
9. historical context on recruitment procedures (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
10. classification of recruitment sources and evaluation methods (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
11. reasoning supporting eligibility cut-off requirements (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. administrative instructions can fill legal gaps (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
13. legitimacy of minimum cut-offs discussed (Para 57 , 58 , 59)
14. constitutional provisions on appointments and consultation (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65)
15. affirmation of the high court's decision (Para 67 , 68 , 69)

JUDGMENT :

Table of Contents

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top