HRISHIKESH ROY, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Abhimeet Sinha – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Judicature at Patna – Respondent
1. The common challenge in these six writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is to the constitutionality of the Rules stipulating minimum qualifying marks in the viva voce test as a part of the selection criteria for appointment to the District Judiciary in the States of Bihar and Gujarat respectively. The writ petitioners have approached this Court alleging a violation of their fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 16 contained in Part III of the Constitution of India. The specific consideration to be made in these matters is whether prescribing minimum qualifying marks for viva voce is in contravention of the law laid down by this Court in All India Judges Association and Others vs. Union of India and Others, (2002) 4 SCC 247 [for short “All India Judges (2002)] which accepted certain recommendations of Justice KJ Shetty Commission (for short “Shetty Commission”). The recruitment pertains to the selection of judicial officers of different ranks and respective selection cycles i.e. District Judge (Entry Level) by direct recruitment from the Bar (2015 Advertisement) for the State of Bihar and the post of Civil Judge (2019 and 2022 Advertisement) for th
All India Judges Association and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Basheshwar Nath vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
Nar Singh Pal vs. Union of India and Others
Dhananjay Malik vs. State of Uttaranchal
Ramesh Chandra Shah vs. Anil Joshi
Anupal Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh
Krishna Rai vs. Banaras Hindu University
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai vs. Union of India
Inderjit Singh Sodhi vs. Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board
All India Judges Association vs. Union of India
All India Judges Association vs. Union of India
Pradeep Kumar Rai vs. Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Dr. Kavita Kamboj vs. High Court of Punjab and Haryana and Others, 2024 SCC Online SC 254 [Para 34
Syed T.A. Naqshbandi vs. State of J&K
All India Judges' Assn. vs. Union of India, (2002) 4 SCC 247 : 2002 SCC (L&S) 508 [Para 38
Rakhi Ray vs. High Court of Delhi
Mahinder Kumar vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Sasidhar Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Syed T.A. Naqshbandi vs. State of J&K
Hemani Malhotra vs. High Court of Delhi
Ramesh Kumar vs. High Court of Delhi
Tej Prakash Pathak and Others vs. Rajasthan High Court and Others
Salam Samarjeet Singh vs. High Court of Manipur at Imphal
Shayara Bano vs. Union of India, 2017 (9) SCC 1 [Para 50
Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39 [Para 50
E.P. Royappa vs. State of T.N.
Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Association for Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India
Lok Prahari vs. Union of India
Lila Dhar vs. State of Rajasthan
K.H. Siraj vs. High Court of Kerela, (2006) 6 SCC 395 [Para 56
Pranav Verma vs. The Registrar General of High Court
Tanya Malik vs. Registrar General of High Court
B.K. Pavitra vs. Union of India
Manish Kumar Shahi vs. State of Bihar
Inderpreet Singh Kahlon vs. State of Punjab
Ashok Kumar Yadav vs. State of Haryana
Sanjay Singh vs. U.P. Public Service Commission
Pranav Verma and Others vs. Registrar General of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana
State of Bihar vs. Bal Mukund Sah
A.C. Thalwal vs. High Court of Himachal Pradesh, (2000) 7 SCC 1 [Para 90
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India
Hari Dutt Kainthla vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
State of U.P. vs. Manbodhan Lal Srivastava
Rajendra Singh Verma vs. Lt. Governor (NCT of Delhi)
Goa Judicial Officer’s Association vs. State of Goa
N. Devasahayam vs. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.