SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 241

BELA M. TRIVEDI, PANKAJ MITHAL
Satyendar Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of Enforcement – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vivek Jain, AOR Mr. Abhinav Jain, Adv. Mr. Amit Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Rajat Jain, Adv. Mr. Shariran Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Umeed Shah, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Sahay, Adv. Mrs. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Sunita Gupta, Adv. Dr. Sushil Satrawala, Adv. Mr. Chandratanay Chaube, Adv. Mr. Ankit Shah, Adv. Mr. Manan Verma, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. S.V. Raju, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Padmesh Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sairica S Raju, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Adv. Ms. Abhipriya, Adv. Mr. Hitarth Raja, Adv. Ms. Madhumita Kesavan, Adv. Mr. Samrat Goswami, Adv. Mr. Harsh Paul Singh, Adv. Ms. Sonali Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kartik Sabarwal, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Kshitiz Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Ritumbhara Garg, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Saini, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. All the three appeals arise out of the common impugned judgment and order dated 06.04.2023 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi, in the Bail Application Nos. 3590 of 2022, 3705 of 2022 and 3710 of 2022, whereby the High Court has rejected all the bail applications of the appellants.

3. Earlier the Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI) -23 (MPs/MLAs cases) vide the separate detailed orders dated 17.11.2022 had rejected the bail applications of all the appellants – accused.

FACTUAL MATRIX

4. An FIR being case No.RC-AC-1-2017-A-0005 dated 24th August, 2017 came to be registered at the CBI AC-1, New Delhi against Shri Satyendar Kumar Jain, Minister in the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Others, for the offences under Section 109 IPC and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the PC Act, 1988 at the instance of the Dy. Superintendent of Police, CBI who had conducted a Preliminary Enquiry, being PE AC-1-2017-A0003 dated 10.04.2017 registered at the said office of the CBI. After the investigation, a Charge-sheet came to be filed by the CBI in respect of the said FIR on 03.12.2018 in the Court of Special Judge, CBI, Patiala Ho

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top