PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ARAVIND KUMAR
Mrinmoy Maity – Appellant
Versus
Chhanda Koley – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Aravind Kumar, J. :
1. Leave granted.
2. The short point that arises for consideration in this appeal is:
3. The facts in brief which has led to filing of the present appeal are as under:
4. An advertisement came to be issued on 09.09.2012 calling for application for distributors to grant LPG distributorship under GP Category at Jamalpur, District Burdwan. From amongst the applications so received, the application submitted by the appellant as well as respondent No.1 were found to be in order. Since both the appellant and the respondent No.1 were held to be eligible from amongst the six (6) candidates, draw of lots was held on 11.05.2013 and appellant was found successful candidate and was selected for verification of the documents. A letter of intent was issued to the appellant on 24.02.2014 and on 03.06.2014 the approval was granted by the BPCL in favour of the appellant for starting LPG distributorship at the notified
Tridip Kumar Dingal and others v. State of W.B and Others.
Moon Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Court, AIR 1967 SC 1450 [Para 11
Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B. Munshi
Durga Prashad v. Chief Controller of Imports & Exports, (1969) 1 SCC 185, AIR 1970 SC 769 [Para 11
Rabindranath Bose v. Union of India, (1970) 1 SCC 84, AIR 1970 SC 470 [Para 11
Karnataka Power Corportion Ltd. and another v. K. Thangappan and another
Maharashtra SRTC v. Shri Balwant Regular Motor Service
State of M.P. v. Nandlal Jaiswal
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board and others v. T.T. Murali Babu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.