SANJAY KAROL, ARAVIND KUMAR
Jyoti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Suket Hospital – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. In ordinary circumstances, a procedure concerning appendicitis is considered to be routine. It did not turn out to be so for Jyoti Devi.1 [Hereafter ‘claimant-appellant’] She was admitted to Suket Hospital, Sundernagar, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh on 28th June 2005 and had her appendicitis removed by Dr. Anil Chauhan, Senior Surgeon, Suket Hospital. Post surgery, she was discharged on 30th June 2005. However, her ordeal did not end there. She suffered continuous pains near the surgical site, as such she was admitted again on 26th July 2005 but was discharged the next day with the assurance that no further pain would be suffered by her. She was further treated by one Dr. L.D. Vaidya of Mandav Hospital, Mandi, on the reference of Dr. Anil Chauhan respondent no. 2 herein. Yet again, there was no end to her suffering. This process continued for a period of four years.
3. The claimant - appellant eventually landed up for treatment at the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Chandigarh. Upon investigation, it was found that a 2.5 cm foreign body (needle) “is present below the anterior abdominal wall in the preveside region just medial to pr
C. Venkatachalam vs. Ajitkumar C. Shah and Others
J.J. Merchant (Dr.) vs. Shrinath Chaturvedi
Common Cause vs. Union of India
M.A. Biviji vs. Sunita and Others
Jacob Matthew vs. State of Punjab
Dr. Mrs. Chanda Rani Akhouri vs. Dr. M.A. Methusethupati
Harish Kumar Khurana vs. Joginder Singh
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences vs. Prasanth S. Dhananka
Balram Prasad vs. Kunal Saha and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.