SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1295

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Sunil Ahya – Appellant
Versus
Election Commission of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Petitioner-in-Person.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner, who appears in person, invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution for a direction to the Election Commission of India to conduct an independent audit of the source code governing the Electronic Voting Machines, applying a particular standard, namely, IEEE 1028.

2. The petitioner, during the course of the submissions, submits that the source code must be independently audited and the report of the audit should be placed in the public domain. The petitioner further submits that if the source code is audited, the hash function signature would be available and it should be placed in the public domain.

3. The petitioner had earlier moved a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution before this Court before the General Election of 2019. This Court, by its order dated 8 April 2019, held that in view of the commencement of the General Elections, it was not possible for it to go into the issue raised in the PIL, but the liberty was given to the petitioner to initiate fresh action. Thereafter, the petitioner instituted another PIL in which by an order dated 24 February 2020, this Court permitted the petitioner to move a representati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top